Comparison

Procurement outsourcing vs an in-house buyer

The honest side-by-side: what a UK buyer really costs, what an outsourced partner covers, and the spend level at which one option overtakes the other.

The true loaded cost of a hire

Salary is only part of the picture. A junior buyer at £38k basic actually costs closer to £48k–£55k once you add employer NI, pension, holiday cover, workspace and management time. A senior procurement manager sits at £70k–£95k loaded.

OptionAnnual costCapacity
Junior in-house buyer£40k–£55k loadedOne person, learning on the job
Senior procurement manager£70k–£95k loadedFull-time, often over-spec'd for SMEs
Outsourced procurement partnerPer project or monthly retainerA team on tap, only when needed

Where each option wins

Outsourcing wins when spend is under about £2m a year, requirements are lumpy, and you'd otherwise be underusing a full-time hire. You pay only for the work done and get instant access to a wider supplier network than any single buyer would build.

An in-house buyer wins when spend is high and steady, supplier relationships need daily management, or the role bundles other operations tasks that need to sit inside the business.

The hybrid most SMEs land on

Many growing SMEs run an internal ops/office lead who owns supplier relationships day-to-day, and use an outsourced partner for anything that needs a market comparison, a benchmark, or a category they don't buy often. That combination usually costs less than a single senior hire and covers more ground.

See the numbers on your spend

Get a benchmark against your current suppliers.

Send us one category you buy regularly. We'll come back with market pricing so you can see what outsourced procurement would actually save.